Legal Opinion

People v. Erickson

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided June 22, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, C. M.

The defendant comes before the court on an information charging him (Code Crim. Proc. § 899, subd. 5) with being a disorderly person in that he falls within that class of “ Persons who have no visible profession or calling, by which to maintain themselves, but who do so, for the most part, by gaming.” This statute was enacted more than one hundred and ten yéars ago and, while invoked on occasion, its application in written opinion, diligent search discloses, has never been treated by the courts of this State.

In the course of an investigation conducted by the commissioner of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. In Re McCueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. People Ex Rel. Woronoff v. . MallonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. People Ex Rel. Van Houter v. SadlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fonte v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Frad v. Columbian National Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1941
  3. People v. Lowey, Horovits & Fischer, Inc.New York City Magistrates' Court · 1946
  4. People v. TillmanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API