Legal Opinion

Jansen v. Nu-West, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 17, 2000No. 18262-2-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— Loans made primarily for commercial purposes are exempt from the usury law. In this usury action, a jury determined that the loan was primarily for a noncommercial purpose and that the usury statute applied. However, while the factual circumstances of making a loan *435are within the province of the jury, the ultimate determination of the primary purpose of the loan is a question of law. We hold that the determination of the loan’s purpose was improperly submitted to the jury, and that the primary purpose of the loan here was commercial, as a matter of law. We therefore reverse the judgment and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. ThomsenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Thweatt v. HommelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beers v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Revocable Living Trust of Strand v. Wel-Co Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Jansen v. Nu-West, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Beers v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST OF STRAND v. Wel-Co Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API