Jansen v. Nu-West, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
— Loans made primarily for commercial purposes are exempt from the usury law. In this usury action, a jury determined that the loan was primarily for a noncommercial purpose and that the usury statute applied. However, while the factual circumstances of making a loan *435are within the province of the jury, the ultimate determination of the primary purpose of the loan is a question of law. We hold that the determination of the loan’s purpose was improperly submitted to the jury, and that the primary purpose of the loan here was commercial, as a matter of law. We therefore reverse the judgment and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- National Bank of Commerce v. ThomsenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Thweatt v. HommelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beers v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Revocable Living Trust of Strand v. Wel-Co Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Jansen v. Nu-West, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Beers v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST OF STRAND v. Wel-Co Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004