Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Leavy
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 28, 2003No. 01-3062PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case is before us on interlocutory appeal. The defendants, members of the Gander Hill Prison MultiDisciplinary Team (“MDT”) and the Delaware Department of Corrections Central Institutional Classification Committee (“CICC”), challenge the District Court’s denial of their summary judgment motion for absolute or qualified immunity from Delaware prisoner Jerome Hamilton’s lawsuit alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment. The 'defendants contend that they are entitled to absolute immunity because they acted pursuant to a court order…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- E. D. v. Daniel SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Blaylock v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Keystone Redevelopment Partners, LLC v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Norbert J. Dotzel, Jr., D/B/A Dotzel Trucking Joanne Dotzel, D/B/A Dotzel Trucking v. Ernest Ashbridge John R. Bower Darren Crispin Salem TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Hamilton v. LeavyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.