Legal Opinion

National Plan Administrators, Inc. v. National Health Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 18, 2004No. 03-03-00306-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

In this case, we must consider the nature of the relationships among an underwriter, a marketing agency, and a third-party administrator in the insurance industry. The trial court determined that the third-party administrator owed the underwriter a fiduciary duty, and a jury assessed damages. In addition, the jury determined that the marketing agent and the third-party administrator operated as a single-business enterprise and so the court assessed all damages, including exemplary damages based on a finding of malice, jointly and severally against the…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. National Plan Administrators, Inc. v. National Health Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  3. Hoffmann v. Dandurand, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  4. Mayeux v. WinderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Waterways on the Intercoastal, Ltd. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API