Legal Opinion
Konet v. Haskins
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 2, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5636PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention to the party Haskins upon two counts of an interference declared between Haskins and Kellogg’s joint application for patent, Serial No. 512,266, filed November 29, 1943, for “Gyro Instrument,” which was later converted to the sole application of Haskins, and an application of the parties Konet and Noxon, Serial No. 569,747, filed December 26, 1944, for “Attitude Indicator.”
No question is raised here as to the counts of the .interference…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re RobertsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Van Auken v. CummingsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Leichsenring v. FeeemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Briggs v. KaislingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Electro Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Norman W. Kirschke and General Electric Company v. William C. LamarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Martin v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954