Legal Opinion
Norman W. Kirschke and General Electric Company v. William C. Lamar
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1970No. 19861_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants brought the instant suit under 35 U.S.C. § 146, challenging the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of January 31, 1967, which awarded priority to an invention to appellee. The district court, the Honorable Elmo B. Hunter, entered judgment for appellee, thereby affirming the Board’s decision. Kirschke v. Lamar, 300 F.Supp. 146 (W.D.Mo.1969).
The center of this controversy is an invention, a self-cleaning combination dishwasher-oven. As stated in the counts of the interference proceeding, the appliance has one interior cavity, used both as an oven…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leslie C. Case v. Cpc International, Inc., and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Co-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Velsicol Chemical Corporation v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Standard Oil Co. v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.