Legal Opinion

Averill v. Perrott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus. Application for mandamus to compel respondent to proceed with- a preliminary examination. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Act No. 435, Local Laws of 1887, confers upon the police justice exclusive and original jurisdiction to hear, try, and determine all criminal cases wherein the crime, misdemeanor, or offense charged shall have been committed within the corporate limits of the city of Bay City, or upon any land, tenements, or hereditaments owned or occupied by or under- the authority of the city of Bay City, within the county of Bay, and which crime, misdemeanor, or offense would be now or hereafter cognizable by a justice of the peace if the same had been committed in any other part of this State; to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re SlatteryMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Hooper v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Leelanau County Sheriff v. KiesselMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. City of Lincoln Park v. SiglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Gratopp v. Van EpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API