Leelanau County Sheriff v. Kiessel
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant James Kiessel appeals by right a circuit court order granting plaintiffs the Leelanau County Sheriff and Leelanau County a writ of superintending control vacating an order of the Leelanau County Prosecuting Attorney (PA), who was serving as a hearing officer under the veterans preference act (VPA), MCL 35.401 et seq. The PA’s order had directed the sheriff to reinstate Kiessel, with back pay, as a deputy. The circuit court held that the PA lacked jurisdiction under the VPA to review the sheriffs discharge of Kiessel, an honorably discharged veteran, because under MCL 51.70, deputies…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McMillian v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Rucker v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Pittsfield Charter Township v. Washtenaw CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Allor v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schmude Oil, Inc. v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Frank Kern III v. Bonnie Kern-KoskelaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017