Legal Opinion
Cate v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided August 4, 1977No. Civ. 3-77-152 and 3-77-153PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge, sitting by designation.
The plaintiffs are three individuals claiming to be insured parties and beneficiaries under a contract of insurance between defendant, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, and South Central Bell Telephone Company. 1 Suit was originally brought in the Chancery Court for Knox County, Tennessee, Division 1, and removed to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs oppose the motion and move to remand the cases to state court. The Court has considered the motions,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Committee for Gi Rights v. Honorable Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Elliott v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Joseph H. Beaman v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Berlin v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937
- The Emma GilesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- American Federation of Unions Local 102 Health & Welfare Fund v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
- Eversole v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1980
- Sixty-Five Security Plan v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- American Progressive Life and Health Insurance Company of New York v. James Corcoran, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.