Legal Opinion
Clallam County Citizens for Safe Drinking Water v. City of Port Angeles
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 6, 2007No. 34881-1-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶[1 In an administrative appeal of a determination of nonsignificance (DNS), the city of Port Angeles (City) council ruled that its decision to fluoridate the public water supply was categorically exempt from environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW. Clallam County Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, Protect the Peninsula’s Future, and Eloise Kailin (collectively Citizens) appealed to the superior court. The superior court dismissed Citizens’ appeal, finding the proposal exempt. Because the superior court correctly determined that the City…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!Washington Supreme Court · 2010
- Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!Washington Supreme Court · 2010
- International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 19 v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our ChoiceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our ChoiceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.