Legal Opinion

City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 15, 2008No. 36935-4-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Penoyar, A.C.J.

¶1 Our Water-Our Choice and Protect Our Waters appeal a trial court decision ruling their initiatives invalid. Both initiatives deal with controlling additives to Port Angeles’ public water supply. Courts do not review initiatives for whether the proposed law is good public policy but do review initiatives for whether they would be lawful if approved. Unlike statewide initiatives, trial courts review the substance and nature of local initiatives before they are submitted to the voters because local initiatives must be consistent with federal and state laws. The trial court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ruano v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. City of Port Angeles v. Our Water-Our Choice!Washington Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API