Legal Opinion
Wiegel v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 2001No. C6-00-2050PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORIS 0. HUSPENI,** Judge
Appellants, contending that they are “aggrieved persons” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 13.08, subd. 4 (2000), challenge the district court’s vacation of an award of attorney fees. Because appellants do not meet the definition of “aggrieved persons,” we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Mark Wiegel is a 16-year veteran of the St. Paul Police Department, and a member of the St. Paul Police Federation. In 1998, Wiegel participated in a promotional examination for the position of police sergeant, administered by the City of St. Paul. The promotional exam was divided into…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Deli v. HasselmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Kirkwold Construction Co. v. M.G.A. Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Washington v. Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wiegel v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001