Kimes v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of intentionally causing the death of Helga Berrott for remuneration or the promise thereof, to be paid by co-defendant George Hendon. After the jury returned a negative response to the question concerning the probability appellant would commit future criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society, the trial court automatically assessed punishment at life in accordance with Tex. Code Crim.Proc. Ann. art. 37.071(é) (Vernon Supp.1987). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Appellant contends in his first point of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Dues v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte KimesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Winkfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- David Meza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.