Legal Opinion

State v. Garcia

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2003No. 01-631PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 In 1998, a jury found the Appellant, Jason Garcia, guilty of sexual intercourse without consent. We reversed the conviction and remanded for a new trial due to an unconstitutional juror summoning process. On remand, approximately eighteen days prior to trial, Garcia moved the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, to continue the trial as his prospective private counsel needed more time to prepare for trial. The District Court denied Garcia’s motion and a jury subsequently convicted him of sexual intercourse without consent. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

¶2 Garcia raises…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Jack L. Linton v. E. P. Perini, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. State v. WeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HendershotMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re J.S.W.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. VonBergenMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Matter of Mental Health of T.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ToulouseMontana Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API