Legal Opinion

Murphy v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Dubuque District Court. — Hon. J. L. Iíusted, Judge. ProoeediNG in probate for the allowance of a claim against the estate of decedent, There was a trial by the court without a jury, and an order allowing the claim. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobiNSON, C. J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover of the estate of Margaret Powers^ deceased, the sum of four hundred *39and. eighty four dollars for board and washing furnished the decedent during a period of one hundred and twenty-one weeks, and the claim was allowed to the amount of four hundred and eighty dollars.

1 I. Mrs. Newman testified as a witness, and was asked, in regard to what the decedent was furnished by the plaintiff, “what it would be worth a week,” and answered: “About $4.50, and very reasonable at that.” The defendant moved that the answer be stricken out on the ground that the witness had not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Langhammer v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Rouse v. . WhitedNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. LoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Sheldon v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Hanson v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Dougherty v. City of SiouxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Lee v. Farmers Mutual Hail InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API