Lee v. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance

The loss for which recovery is sought occurred in July, 1928, the result of two hail storms. The crops covered by the policy consisted of 80 acres of oats and 120 acres, of corn. The case comes to us for review upon numerous propositions involving certain paragraphs of the court’s charge to the jury and numerous rulings of the court during the progress of the trial. Propositions I, II, and VI do not in form or substance present error.

I. No proofs .of loss were filed by appellee. He relies upon waiver. It appears from the testimony that appellant’s adjusters visited the premises of appellee,…