Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Jeffreys

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 19, 2007No. 3:06 CV 701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID A. KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R & R) of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 15) and Petitioner Donovan Tanner’s objections to the R & R (Doc. 18), without response by Respondent Warden Robert Jeffreys. In accordance with Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208 (6th Cir.1981) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C), this Court has made a de novo determination of those of the Magistrate Judge’s findings to which Petitioner objects.

I. Factual background

The statement of facts pertaining to Petitioner’s claims is adopted from the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Furman v. MackeyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. Monaco v. ForsheyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  3. Young v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API