Legal Opinion

Little v. Willford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Olmsted county, alleging title in fee in himself to a certain described lot of land in that county, and that the defendants, in March and April, 1882, “unlawfully and' wrongfully, and with strong hand, entered upon said land, and broke,, took down and dismantled the buildings thereon, and took away and carried away the materials thereof, and the seats and fixtures attached thereto, and converted the same to their own…

Read the full summary

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Olmsted county, alleging title in fee in himself to a certain described lot of land in that county, and that the defendants, in March and April, 1882, “unlawfully and' wrongfully, and with strong hand, entered upon said land, and broke,, took down and dismantled the buildings thereon, and took away and carried away the materials thereof, and the seats and fixtures attached thereto, and converted the same to their own use, against the will of the plaintiff, and to his damage $1,200.” He further alleges “that the frame and part of the…

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

On the second day of May, 1868, the plaintiff attempted to convey a building site, to be occupied by a religious association, known as “The Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church for the Elgin Circuit,” for a church building. The same society also had a place of worship in the adjoining county of Wabasha, and were a de facto organization, in conformity with the usages and. discipline of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and had previously attempted to become incorporated in that county, by the election of trustees, and the execution and record of the proper certificate, which, however, was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Curtiss v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  4. Harris v. . FrinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Johnson v. SkillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Watkins v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Cooke v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Congdon v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API