Holmes v. . Mead
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The only parties represented upon this appeal, or so far as appears, in the action, are the executors of the will of Dr. Creighton, who are plaintiffs, and Mr. and Mrs. Mead, of the defendants, the latter being one of the heirs and next of kin to the testator, whose interests are adverse to the questioned trusts; and the former, her busband, being one of the executors, expressing a desire to carry the will into execution, and both, by their joint answer,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Owens v. . the Missionary Society of the M.E. ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Burrill v. . BoardmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Potter v. ChapinNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Congar v. ChamberlainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by66 opinions
- Allen v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Sherman v. Richmond Hose Co. No. 2New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Brown v. . QuintardNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- St. Joseph's Hospital v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.