Legal Opinion

Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. Stanton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 13, 1893No. 8194PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal by defendants Samuel L. Dobson and Nicholas Martin, from a judgment of the District Court of Polk County, Ira B. Mills, J., entered January 28, 1893. . The plaintiff, the Merchants’ National Bank of Crookston, brought this action to foreclose a mortgage given to it on April 14, 1887, by defendants, Robert Stanton and wife, upon lot seven (7) in block twelve (12) in Fletcher & Houston’s Addition to Crookston, to secure the payment to it of the note of himself and…

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendants Samuel L. Dobson and Nicholas Martin, from a judgment of the District Court of Polk County, Ira B. Mills, J., entered January 28, 1893. . The plaintiff, the Merchants’ National Bank of Crookston, brought this action to foreclose a mortgage given to it on April 14, 1887, by defendants, Robert Stanton and wife, upon lot seven (7) in block twelve (12) in Fletcher & Houston’s Addition to Crookston, to secure the payment to it of the note of himself and defendant Dobson of $5,050 and interest. Stanton bought the lot and took a deed of it that day from Dobson and wife. In 1888…

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The real issues in this case are somewhat obscured by the prolixity of the stipulated facts, (adopted by the trial court as its findings,) which contain much that was unnecessary for the determination of the case in the court below, and still more that is immaterial in the decision of any question involved in this appeal.

The primary object of this action was to foreclose a mortgage, and the principal question in the case is whether a certain building and the machinery therein, situated on the mortgaged premises, was, as between the plaintiff and defendants Dobson and Martin, the personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McArthur v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  2. Crippen v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Little v. WillfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Davenport v. John G. Shants & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1871

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fischer v. Johnson Lane & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API