Legal Opinion

Butz v. Township of Danbury

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 2010No. OT-08-057PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pietrykowski, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Township of Danbury, Ohio, and Danbury Township Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”), appeal the trial court’s decision reversing the BZA’s denial of an application for variances filed by plaintiffs-appellees, Jim Butz and Mary Butz. For the reasons that follow, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

{¶ 2} In September 2006, the Butzes purchased a single-story, single-family residence at 230 Elm Avenue, Lakeside, Ohio. The residence was and continues to be a nonconforming use of real estate. The residence is nonconforming in two respects: (1)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mills v. Walnut Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API