Butz v. Township of Danbury
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pietrykowski, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Township of Danbury, Ohio, and Danbury Township Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”), appeal the trial court’s decision reversing the BZA’s denial of an application for variances filed by plaintiffs-appellees, Jim Butz and Mary Butz. For the reasons that follow, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
{¶ 2} In September 2006, the Butzes purchased a single-story, single-family residence at 230 Elm Avenue, Lakeside, Ohio. The residence was and continues to be a nonconforming use of real estate. The residence is nonconforming in two respects: (1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mills v. Walnut Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023