Legal Opinion

In Re La Croix

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1974No. Crim. 17036PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus claiming that he is improperly incarcerated as a parole violator without having been accorded parole revocation hearings mandated by Morrissey v. Brewer (1973) 408 U.S. 471 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593], We agree in part with petitioner but for reasons hereinafter stated hold that he is not entitled to relief.

Petitioner was convicted in 1971 of the felony of issuing a check without sufficient funds in the bank to cover the same and was sentenced to the state prison for the term prescribed by law. Thereafter, his term was fixed by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. ArreolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. State v. JamesonArizona Supreme Court · 1975

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API