Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Pruitt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 20, 1932No. 31508Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

ROGERS, J.

A re-examination of this case has confirmed our 'opinion that plaintiff is not entitled to the homestead exemption claimed by him.

In considering the question of the damages awarded on the dissolution of the injunction, we are confronted by two propositions, viz.:’ Vv hether, because of the homestead exemption attaching to a certain bay mule seized and advertised for sale with the land, any damages whatever can be allowed, and whether the law authorizing the imposition of statutory damages is applicable to a case in which the facts are as disclosed by this record.

First.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Whitney-Central Nat. Bank v. SinnottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Dabbs v. HemkenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  3. Meaux v. PittmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. de Lizardi v. HardawaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  5. Davis v. ComptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API