Legal Opinion

Calame v. Stevens

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1952No. Civ. 14885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, J. pro tem.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on account of personal injuries suffered when he fell from a metal framework over the entrance to defendant’s used car lot in San Jose. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury.

The framework from which plaintiff fell was made of iron pipes 2 or 2% inches in diameter. An upright pipe stood on each side of the entrance to the lot extending upward 10 to 12 feet. These uprights were connected at the top by a hori zontal pipe of the same size. The two gates of the entrance hinged on the uprights, and a wire fence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. DeGraf v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pope v. Edward M. Rude Carrier Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Gilbert v. Pessin Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Slovick v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Poulsen v. CharltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API