United States v. Byron Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we must examine whether there is any basis to justify the introduction into evidence of an anonymous note that was plainly hearsay. Appellant Byron Mitchell, who was convicted of conspiracy to commit and commission of Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and use of and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), contends that the district court committed reversible error by permitting an anonymous note linking him to the getaway car to be admitted into evidence as a present sense…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Byron MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Neil Saada and Isaac Saada, A/K/A ZuckieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Ernst v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Russo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- United States v. Vernon JoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.