Legal Opinion

David v. Weitzman

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 14, 1987No. Civ. N-87-237(JAC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:

BACKGROUND

The principal question presented is whether this court has personal jurisdiction over defendants whose sole contact with the forum state was to send into it by mail and telephone fraudulent misrepresentations. The action arises out of negotiations to purchase a condominium in Boca Rio, Florida. The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Connecticut; the defendants — both individual and corporate — are citizens of Florida. Jurisdiction in grounded in diversity of citizenship,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  5. Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Memorial Hospital System v. Fisher Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Vertrue Inc. v. MeshkinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  3. Doe I v. CiolliDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  4. Reese v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  5. Van Essche v. LeroyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API