Legal Opinion
Reese v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 14, 2001No. Civ. 3:00CV827(JBA)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*85RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS [Docs. ## 23, 11]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this suit on behalf of himself and three putative classes, claiming that defendants Arrow Financial Services, LLC (“Arrow”), Robert Lavin, Jack Lavin and Ronald Lavin violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692(d), (e) and (f) (“FDCPA”) and the Connecticut Uniform Trade Practices Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42-110a (“CUTPA”) by their activities in connection with collecting on charged-off debt bought by defendant Arrow. According to plaintiff, defendant Arrow attempted to collect on his…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spencer v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Edge v. C. Tech Collections, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Weissman v. ABC Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Perkins v. Southern New England Telephone Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Sanft v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.