Mobile County v. London Lancashire Ins. Co.
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge.
The decisive question on this appeal may well be considered to be the propriety vel non of the trial court’s action in sustaining defendant’s (appellee’s) demurrers to plaintiff’s (appellant’s) amended count C, which is in words and figures as follows, to wit: “C. The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of Three Hundred Twelve and 9/100 (312.09) Dollars, for that heretofore on to-wit, the first day of October, 1931, the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant, by the terms of which the defendant agreed to issue a policy of fire insurance on the Court House…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Russell v. RichardAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dudley v. WhatleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942