Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Whatley

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1942No. 5 Div. 157Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

SIMPSON, Judge.

Appellant now contends that the- rejected evidence regarding the overpayment of certain sums of money to plaintiff’s intestate purposed to show that the mortgage and rent debts were co-existent, that he was liquidating both, serially, by the payments, proof of which he attempted to offer; and which proof (excluded) would have shown that, in making payments on these debts, he had paid in excess of both. But the record clearly discloses otherwise.

Intention to pay and receive as payment is essential to constitute payment. A debt is not paid unless by mutual intention…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. McCurdy v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API