Claim of Hollander v. Valor Clothers, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—■ Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 7, 1981, which ruled that claimant was not disabled due to an occupational disease and denied his claim for benefits. The sole issue in this case is whether the concededly poor working conditions present at claimant’s place of employment, coupled with the fact that he was required to spot clean garments using carbon tetrachloride, benzene and other toxic fluids, either caused or aggravated a pre-existing pulmonary condition to the point that he had to cease work because of an occupational disease within the meaning of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Perez v. Pearl-Wick Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of Strouse v. Village of EndicottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Cocco v. New York City Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Claim of Jarvis v. Stewart Airport DinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Fredenburg v. Emerson Power TransmissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Lemery v. Flintkote Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.