Legal Opinion
Claim of Strouse v. Village of Endicott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 1975PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 30, 1974, as amended on November 22, 1974, which awarded benefits to the claimant for occupational disease. Claimant was employed as a "meter maid” for approximately 14 years for the Village of Endicott Police Department. Her duties required long periods of walking on village streets. Claimant suffers from a condition known as cavus foot, wherein the arches are higher than normal, which condition, it is not disputed, pre-existed her employment as a meter maid. However, she had never suffered any pain or had any other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- MATTER OF BENWARE v. Benware CreameryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Claim of Benware v. CreameryNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Claim of Pacifico v. Treadway Inns Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
3Cited by11 opinions
- Claim of Perez v. Pearl-Wick Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Claim of Kuczkowski v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claim of Lopez v. Hercules Corrugated Box Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of McDonald v. DanforthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Hollander v. Valor Clothers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.