Fredenburg v. Emerson Power Transmission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 27, 2002, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant sustained a causally related occupational disease.
Claimant’s job with the employer exposed her to certain chemicals, including a black powdery lubricant known as molykote. She had worked at her position since 1990 and occasionally missed work because of respiratory problems in the mid-1990s. Beginning in September 1999, she missed significant periods of time from work because of asthma and she filed a claim for benefits in December 1999. Upon the advice of her physician,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hastings v. Fairport Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Cocco v. New York City Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Hosmer v. Emerson Power TransmissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Hollander v. Valor Clothers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claim of Bonneau v. New York City Department of SanitationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Pulos v. Asplundh TreeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Tipping v. Orthopedic Surgeons of Long IslandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Leary v. NYC Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Carlson-Fanelli v. St. Luke's Memorial Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Matter of Durkot v. NewsdayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017