Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires the court to make a determination of the legal efficacy of a claim based on the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.1
I
The plaintiffs brought this class action on behalf of “all those present or future Cherokee Indians who practice the traditional Cherokee religion and adhere to Cherokee Indian tradition and culture.” The principal relief sought in the complaint was an injunction to prevent completion and flooding of the Tellico Dam on the Little Tennessee River in Monroe County, Tennessee. The complaint alleged that the impoundment created by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- People v. WoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Weaver v. JagoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Crow v. GulletDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
- Alabama v. Trustees of the Big Sandy Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
- Bob Mozert v. Hawkins County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. BillieDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.