Deckert v. Western & Southern Life Ins.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
This is an action to recover under the disability clause in a life insurance policy.
The plaintiff, Deckert, since early youth had been engaged in the trade of tanning leather. He had become adept in operating a leather splitting machine and doing all things necessary to finish leather. In the year 1919 he entered the employ of the American Oak and Leather Company as a leather splitter. He continued in this until 1939 when he and his friend Shepherd formed a partnership known as Deckert, Shepherd and Company. This partnership was the result of the abandonment by the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- McCutchen v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rushing v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1955
- Hawes v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1955
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944