Legal Opinion

Deckert v. Western & Southern Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided July 30, 1943No. 104PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWINFORD, District Judge.

This is an action to recover under the disability clause in a life insurance policy.

The plaintiff, Deckert, since early youth had been engaged in the trade of tanning leather. He had become adept in operating a leather splitting machine and doing all things necessary to finish leather. In the year 1919 he entered the employ of the American Oak and Leather Company as a leather splitter. He continued in this until 1939 when he and his friend Shepherd formed a partnership known as Deckert, Shepherd and Company. This partnership was the result of the abandonment by the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. McCutchen v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Hawes v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1955
  3. Western & Southern Life Insurance v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API