Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J. G.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 26, 1987No. 59,388PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, J.:

The natural mother appeals the district court’s termination of her parental rights, raising two issues. She contends the district court committed reversible error in failing to require the preparation of a reintegration plan pursuant to K.S.A. *4538-1565. She also contends the district court’s termination order failed to comply with K.S.A. 38-1583 because it was not supported by clear and convincing evidence that she was unfit by reason of conduct or condition, and that the conduct or condition was unlikely to change in the foreseeable future. We find no error.

The children who are the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vallimont v. MedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. In Re ArmentroutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. In Re ReedCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  4. In the Interest of HambeltonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In The Interest of S.M.Q.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. In the Interest of A.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  4. In re H.A.M.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  5. In the Interest of M.D.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API