In the Interest of A.S.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, C.J.:
The natural parents of A.L.S., A.S., and M.S. appeal from a judgment terminating their parental rights. They challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and claim the doctrine of res judicata barred the court from considering evidence concerning parental skills and parent-child relationships which had previously been considered and found inadequate to sever parental -rights.
In February of 1980, a petition was filed alleging A.L.S. and her brother, J.S., to be deprived children. The parental rights to J.S. were severed in 1984, and he has been adopted. (Since J.S. is not subject to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (83-De)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lostutter v. Estate of LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GreisamerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Interest of VBNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- In The Interest of S.M.Q.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- State ex rel. J.J.T.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Kent v. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.