Legal Opinion
Meadows v. Employers Health Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 14, 1993No. CIV 92-1201 PHX PGRPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
This removed action arises out of an insurance claim made by the plaintiff, The Meadows, under a policy issued by the defendant, Employers Health Insurance (Employers Health). The Meadows, a health care provider, contends that Employers Health wrongfully refused to pay the expenses of two of the Meadows’ patients after representing that the patients were covered by an Employers Health insurance policy.
Employers Health has moved to dismiss The Meadows’ complaint as preempted by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The Meadows…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Memorial Hospital System v. Northbrook Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Robert Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. National League of PostmastersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- The Meadows, an Arizona Corporation v. Employers Health Insurance, a Wisconsin Corporation Doing Business in the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Laurie Lyons v. Alaska Teamsters Employer Service Corporation Gerald HoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 v. Principal Health Care of Louisiana, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Alloco v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.