Legal Opinion

Alloco v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 31, 2003No. CIV.01-2220-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SILVER, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on All Claims Relating to Long Term Disability Benefits [Doc. # 19], filed March 15, 2002. Plaintiff submitted a Response [Doc. # 25] on April 22, 2002, and Defendant filed a Reply on May 17, 2002 [Doc. #27], For the following reasons, partial summary judgment will be granted for Defendant on Plaintiffs claims relating to long term disability benefits. 1

I. Facts

The following facts are not in dispute. At all relevant times, Plaintiff Cynthia Al-locco was employed as a telephone service…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API