Legal Opinion
The Meadows, an Arizona Corporation v. Employers Health Insurance, a Wisconsin Corporation Doing Business in the State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1995No. 93-16315PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Employers Health Insurance appeals the district court’s order remanding for a second time to the Arizona Superior Court Plaintiff-Appellee The Meadows’ state law action. The Meadows sued Employers Health Insurance for negligent misrepresentation, estoppel, and breach of contract arising out of an inquiry concerning coverage. The district court held that in the circumstances of this case, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) did not preempt these state law causes of action. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Marin General Hospital v. Modesto & Empire Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. National League of PostmastersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Home Health, Inc. v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Plastic Surgery Center, P.A. v. Aetna Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.