Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Ming

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Adams, J. Replevin by Eber L. Kelsey against Fred R. Ming. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In October, 1895, Charles E. Kelsey executed a mortgage upon a quantity of lumber, to the Union Trust Company, as trustee, to secure a debt due the plaintiff of $13,000, and one to Charles L. ’Kelsey of upwards of $2,000, and stated the lumber was clear of all liens, “except possible legal liens for saw bills,” etc. The lumber was then piled upon the docks belonging to the owners of the mills where the lumber was cut. This mortgage was properly filed. In December following, a writ of attachment against Charles E. Kelsey was placed in the hands of defendant, who was sheriff of the county, and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morse v. ByamMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lyle v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hoffman v. HarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Rose v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lillibridge v. TregentMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Dothan Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Kelsey v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gerasimos v. WartellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API