Legal Opinion

Rose v. Page

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Charlevoix. (Ramsdell, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of trover for the conversion of two buildings. These buildings, the property of the plaintiff, were situated on leased ground. She was also the owner of a small steam-boat.

April 15, 1887, she and her husband executed a chattel mortgage upon one of the buildings and the boat to one Martin, to secure the payment of $50. On the 28th Of the same month, they executed another mortgage upon both of the buildings and the boat to Martin, to secure' the payment of $108. May 24, they executed a third mortgage upon the boat alone to the defendant, to secure the payment of $143.20.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robins v. SwainIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ledyard v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Merritt v. NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Denham v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Bridgman v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Great Northern State Bank v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  2. McInerney & Conway Finance Corp. v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Myers, Tice & Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Cavanaugh v. SandersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Board of Water Commissioners v. LormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API