Legal Opinion

Queirolo v. Queirolo

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1900No. S.F. No. 1449PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco modifying a decree of divorce as to the custody of the children. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. F. D. Brandon, James A. Devoto, and Devoto & Demartini, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order modifying a decree, given and made November 18, 1896, by which plaintiff obtained a divorce from defendant on the ground of her extreme cruelty, and awarding the custody of their three minor children to defendant.

On November 22, 1897, plaintiff filed a verified petition in the action, setting forth, among other facts, that defendant is residing with said three children at No. 321 Pacific street; that the children are of tender years, to wit, one a boy aged nine years, one a girl aged seven years, and one a girl aged five years; “that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Reclamation District No. 535 v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Paulucci v. J. H. Verity & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. ThirlwallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Ferrari v. MambrettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Poncet v. South N. O. Light & Traction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API