Senn v. Senn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Commissioner.
On February 2, 1954, a decree was entered granting plaintiff a divorce from defendant. No alimony was allowed. Plaintiff was given the custody of the only child of the parties, a daughter then less than 4 years of age. Defendant was ordered to pay $10 per week for the support of the child and was given the right of visitation. In June 1958, plaintiff made a motion for a modification of the divorce decree granting her a larger amount for the support of the child, alimony, and a change in the provisions concerning visitation. She also asked for an order restraining…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Novotny v. NovotnySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Hellman v. HellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Kate v. KateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Menke v. MenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Tammen v. TammenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Gannon v. GannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.