Legal Opinion

Senn v. Senn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1959No. 37,630PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Commissioner.

On February 2, 1954, a decree was entered granting plaintiff a divorce from defendant. No alimony was allowed. Plaintiff was given the custody of the only child of the parties, a daughter then less than 4 years of age. Defendant was ordered to pay $10 per week for the support of the child and was given the right of visitation. In June 1958, plaintiff made a motion for a modification of the divorce decree granting her a larger amount for the support of the child, alimony, and a change in the provisions concerning visitation. She also asked for an order restraining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mark v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Novotny v. NovotnySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Hellman v. HellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Kate v. KateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Menke v. MenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kiesow v. KiesowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Tammen v. TammenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Gannon v. GannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API