Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Sayre
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 13, 1998No. 89548PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, J:
¶ 1 Maternal grandfather appealed the denial of his application for grandparental visitation based upon the trial court’s ruling that a provision in 10 O.S. Supp.1996 § 5, granting visitation rights with a grandchild, was unconstitutional as applied to the facts of this case. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, finding application of 10 O.S. § 5(A)(1) unconstitutional under the existing facts.
¶ 2 Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court but vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals.
¶ 3 Christopher Herbst, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Lulay v. LulayIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Koshko v. HainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Santi v. SantiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Moriarty v. BradtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.