Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Devlin
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 20, 1991No. Civ. 90-6391-HOPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
MICHAEL R. HOGAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is an action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the Forest Service and its employees (Forest Service). Plaintiffs challenge the Forest Service’s decision to offer the Calapooya II Timber Sale on the North Umpqua Ranger District of the Umpqua National Forest, without examining or discussing the vegetation management strategy of prevention. In October 1988, the Umpqua National Forest prepared an environmental assessment (EA) and proposed the Mayflower and Cala-pooya timber sales. On October 20, 1988, after…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oregon Natural Resources Council v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council v. Matt Anderson, Supervisor Bitterroot National Forest; Troy Heithecker, Acting Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Northern Region; U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2026
- Native Village of Point Hope v. Minerals Management ServiceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.