Roby v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The charging, part of the indictment is set out in the opinion. Motion in arrest of judgment attacking the sufficiency of the indictment was overruled.,
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID SOR, Presiding Judge.
The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “That Edwin Roby, * * * being then and there the agent, manager, and president of the Tyler Banking Company, the same being then and there a banking institution doing business in Smith County, Texas, did then and there unlawfully receive and assent to the reception into the said Tyler Banking Company, a deposit of money, to wit, one hundred dollars in lawful money of the United States of the value of one hundred dollars, from P. E. Arthur, after the said Tyler Banking Company was insolvent and in failing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- President of the Bank of Alabama v. SimontonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Colter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Carder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Meredith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- In re RovnianekNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913