Cooper v. Gordon
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating a judgment of dismissal of an action. William E. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, J.—
This action was commenced on the fifth day .of April, 1883, and summons was issued on the same day. The summons, so far as appears, was never served on any of the defendants, and no return thereof was ever made or filed. The suit was to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a printing press and other contents of a printing office, given to secure an indebtedness for defendant Gordon, according to the terms of a promissory note which is set out in the complaint. As to the other defendants, the complaint merely avers that they have, or claim to have, some interest in the property. So far…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.