Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Construction Co. v. Christiana Construction Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 27, 1928No. 111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The demurrer sets forth five grounds, but only two were argued and relied on, viz.:(1) That the plaintiff’s statement was not filed in the time required by law; and(2) That any claim the plaintiff may have had is not assert-able against the property in the hands of a purchaser subsequent to the receivership of the Wilmington Sugar Refining Company and *149the sale of the property by the receiver under the Chancellor’s decree.

In determining the demurrer, the court will consider the first ground only, viz., that plaintiff’s statement of claim was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Feick v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  4. Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1921
  5. Catlin v. DouglassUnited States Circuit Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. WallaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pittman-Berger Co. v. ParkinsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API