Legal Opinion

Tucson v. Farrington

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1974No. Docket 17038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeneweth, J.

Morris and Hazel Farrington, landowners in St. Clair County, appeal from a judgment entered against them by Judge Halford Streeter for specific performance to convey their farm. The case was tried in equity without a jury before the late Judge Stanley Schlee, who passed away before a decision was rendered. By stipulation, the parties agreed to submit the record of the trial to Judge Streeter for decision rather than going through a new trial. Given the equitable nature of an action for specific performance, this Court has reviewed the record de novo. Johnson v Johnson, 363 Mich 354, 357; 109…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Cramer v. BallardMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Goldberg v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelly-Stehney & Associates, Inc. v. MACDONALD'S INDUS. PRODUCTS, INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tucson v. FarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Tucson v. FarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Tucson v. FarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API