Tucson v. Farrington

396 Mich. 169 (1976)

240 N.W.2d 464

TUCSON

v.

FARRINGTON

Docket No. 56276, (Calendar No. 10).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 6, 1975.

Decided April 1, 1976.

Charles Rubiner and Arthur James Rubiner for plaintiffs.

Bush, Luce, Henderson, Black & Bankson (Eugene F. Black, of counsel) for defendants.

Decided April 1, 1976. Rehearing denied 396 Mich 992.

FITZGERALD, J.

Plaintiffs Tucson sued defendants Farrington for specific performance. Based on plaintiffs' exhibit 1,[1] the trial court found that an enforceable agreement for the sale of defendants' farm existed and entered a judgment for the…